Avaliação das aprendizagens em instituições educativas FCG 2022

210 211 RE F ERÊNC I AS Stacey, O. , De Lazzari, G., Grayson, H., Griffin, H., Jones, E., Taylor, A. e Thomas, D. (2018). The Globaliza- tion of Science Curricula : Springer. Stephens, M. , Warren, L. K. e Harner, A. L. (2015). Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-20 Countries: 2015 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Stiggins, R. (2017). The perfect assessment system : ASCD. Stosich, E. L. , Snyder, J. e Wilczak, K. (2018). How do states integrate performance assessment in their systems of assessment ? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26 . Swaffield, S. , Rawi, R. e O’Shea, A. (2016). Developing Assessment for Learning Practice in a School Cluster: Primary and Secondary Teachers Learning Together. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Lear- ning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 199-217). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Swiss Coordination Centre for Research in Education. (2018). Swiss Education Report 2018 . Aarau: Swiss Coordination Centre for Research in Education. Tan, J. P.-L. , Koh, E., Chan, M., Costes-Onishi, P. e Hung, D. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Singapore. Singapore : Center for Global Education. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment – Summative and formative – Some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53 (4), 466-478. Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia – Social and Beha- vioral Sciences, 2 (2), 3015-3022. Teixeira, R. (2015). Ensino de Matemática: O Método de Singapura. Expresso . Teodoro, A. (2000). O fim do isolacionismo. Da participação de Portugal no Plano Marshall ao Projecto Regional do Mediterrâneo. Revista Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, 3 , 48-54. Theisens, H. (2012). Effective governance from the centre. GCES Conference, Hague, 21-22 November 2012. Thompson, M. e Goe, L. (2009). Models for effective and scalable teacher professional development. USA: ETS Research Report Series. Thum, Y. M. , Tarasawa, B., Hegeeqs, A., Yun, X. e Bowe, B. (2015). Keeping Learning on Track: A Case-Stu- dy of Formative Assessment Practice and Its Impact on Learning in Meridian School District. Tobin, M. , Lietz, P., Nugroho, D., Vivekanandan, R. e Nyamkhuu, T. (2015). Using large-scale assessments of students' learning to inform education policy: Insights from the Asia-Pacific region. Torrance, H. e Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5), 615- 631. UNESCO. (1990). World Declaration on Education for All and Framework for Action to Meet Basic Lear- ning Needs. Paris: Inter-Agency Commission. UNESCO. (2014). Global Citizenship Education: Preparing Learners for the Challenge of the 21st Century: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). UNESCO. (2018). Quick Guide No. 2. Making the Case for a Learning Assessment . Paris: UNESCO. UNES- CO. (2019). Meeting commitments: Are countries on track to achieve SDG 4? Paris: United Nations Educatio- nal, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Brasil. (2015). Educação para a cidadania global:preparando alunos para os desafios do século XXI . Brasília: UNESCO Brasil. UNESCO Brasil. (2016). Educação para a cidadania global: Tópicos e objetivos de aprendizagem. Brasília : UNESCO Brasil. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2012). International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 2011 . Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2019). Singapore ISCED 2011 Mapping. http://uis.unesco.org/en/is- ced-mappings Vanda, L. , Duarte, A., Nunes, A., Amaral, A., Gonçalves, C., Mota, M. e Mendes, R. (2019). PISA 2018 – Por- tugal, Relatório Nacional . Lisboa: IAVE. Ramos, G. e Schleicher, A. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. France: OECD. Rautalin, M., Alasuutari, P. e Vento, E. (2018). Globalisation of education policies: does PISA have an effect? Journal of Education Policy , 34(4), 500-522. Rinne, R. , Kallo, J. e Hokka, S. (2004). Too eager to comply? OECD education policies and the Finnish res- ponse. European Educational Research Journal , 3(2), 454-485. Roldão, M. C. e Ferro, N. (2015). O que é avaliar? Reconstrução de práticas e conceções de avaliação. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional , 26(63), 570-594. Rosa, V. A. , Maia, J. S., Mascarenhas, D. e Teodoro, A. (2020). PISA, TIMSS e PIRLS em Portugal: Uma análise comparativa: PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS in Portugal: A comparative analysis. Revista Portuguesa de Educação , 33(1), 94-120. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. e Li, M. (2013). Analyzing Teachers' Feedback Practices in Response to Students' Work in Science Classrooms. Applied Measurement in Education , 26(3), 163-175. Saarela, M. e Kärkkäinen, T. (2017). Knowledge Discovery from the Programme for International Student Assessment. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends: A View of the Current State of the Art to Enhance e-Learning (pp. 229-267). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science , 18, 119-140. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative Assessment: revisiting the territory. A ssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 5(1), 77-84. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Lições Finlandesas 2.0 – O Que a Mudança Educacional na Finlândia Pode Ensinar Ao Mundo? S. Paulo: SESI-SP editora. Sampaio, J. S. (1980). Portugal – A educação em números. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte. Santiago, P. , Donaldson, G., Looney, A. e Nusche, D. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Portugal 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing. Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to build a 21stc entury school system, Strong Performers and Successful. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scliar-Cabral, L. (2019). Políticas Públicas de Alfabetização. Ilha do Desterro, 72 , 271-290. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. G. Tyler & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives on Cur- riculum Evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand Mcnally. Scriven, M. (1996). The theory behind practical evaluation. Evaluation , 2(4), 393-404. Shepard, L. A. , Penuel, W. R. e Davidson, K. L. (2017). Design principles for new systems of assessment. Phi Delta Kappan , 98(6), 47-52. Siarova, H. , Sternadel, D. e Mašidlauskaitė, R. (2017). Assessment practices for 21st century learning: re- view of evidence. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union . Silveira, P. B. d. (2016). Avaliação da Aprendizagem no contexto do Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil. Singer-Brodowski, M. , Brock, A., Etzkorn, N. e Otte, I. (2019). Monitoring of education for sustainable development in Germany – insights from early childhood education, school and higher education. Environ- mental Education Research , 25(4), 492-507. Singer-Brodowski, M. , von Seggern, J., Duveneck, A. e Etzkorn, N. (2020). Moving (Reflexively within) Struc- tures. The Governance of Education for Sustainable Development in Germany. Sustainability, 12 (7), 2778. Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should Inquiry-Based Science Education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14 (2), 186-202. Sousa, H. D. (2012). Exames nacionais: instrumentos de regulação de boas práticas de ensino e de apren- dizagem? In J. Karpicke, H. D. Sousa & L. d. S. Almeida (Eds.), A avaliação dos alunos (pp. 41-69). Lisboa: Fundação Manuel dos Santos. Sperrhake, R. e Piccoli, L. (2020). Instrumentos para avaliação formativa da alfabetização: princípios con- ceituais e metodológicos. Em Aberto, 33 (108), 47-67.